TWO WORDS UTTERANCES ( PSYCHOLINGUISTIC )
In the middle 1960s, under the influence of Chomsky’s vision of
linguistics, the first child language researchers assumed that language begins
when words (or morphemes) are combined. Within a few months of
producing one word utterances children will begin to produce two-word
utterances. When child can produce two-word utterances, in General Stages of
Linguistic Development that is include in Telegraphic Stage.
Typically children start to combine words when they are between 18
- 24 months of age, consisting of
utterances generally two nouns or a noun and a verb. Some examples of this are:
·
Baby chair, meaning 'The baby is sitting
on the chair' (each has it’s own intonation)
·
Doggie bark, meaning 'The dog is
barking' (each has it’s own intonation)
The children are systematically simpler
than adult speech. For example, the child function words are generally not used
like the omission of inflections, such as -s, -ing, -ed, and conjunctions (and),
articles (the, a), and prepositions (with) are omitted too.
In Roger
Brown’s Research, Brown collected samples of
spontaneous speech from three children. Here is an early attempt to write a
“syntactic” grammar of two-word speech, first describing only 89 observed
utterances (Table 1), then going “beyond the obtained sentences to the
syntactic classes they suggest (Table 2) :
Table
1
Table 2
Then Brown and his co-workers started
instead to describe two-word utterances in
semantic terms. The result was the
identification of a small set of basic semantic relations that the
children’s utterances seems to be expressing. Most common of these are
summarized in the following table.
Table: Two Word Utterances, Roger
Brown’s Meaning Relation
It seems that children when they first
combine words talk about objects: pointing them
out, naming them, indicating their location, what they are like,
who owns them, and who is doing things to them. They also talk about actions
performed by people, and the objects and locations of these actions. Brown
suggested that these are the concepts the child has just finished
differentiating in the sensorimotor stage.
This kind of semantic characterization of children’s speech
continues in current research. For example, the following table is redrawn from
Golinkoff & Hirsh-Pasek, (1999, p. 151.) The terminology differs a little,
and Recurrence and Disappearance have been added (or at least were not in
Brown’s “top eight”), but other than this the picture is the same.
Two-Word Utterance
|
Probable meaning expressed
|
Possible gloss
|
Mommy sock
|
Possessor-possessed
or
Agent
(acting on) an object
|
“That’s
Mommy’s sock” or “Mommy, put on my sock”
|
More juice!
|
Recurrence
|
“I want more juice”
|
Allgone outside
|
Disappearance
or
Nonexistence
|
“The
outside is allgone” (said after front door is closed)
|
Throw chicken
|
Action on object
|
“(Dad) is throwing the toy
chicken”
|
Car go
|
Agent
doing an action
|
“The car
is going”
|
Sweater chair
|
Object at location
|
“The sweater is on the
chair”
|
Little
dog
|
Object
and property
|
“The dog
is little”
|
That
Susan
|
Naming
|
“That is Susan” or “Her
name is Susan”
|
Comments
Post a Comment